UNYX connects regulated financial institutions so they can settle cross-border payments directly for faster, cheaper and compliant transfers.
Tell us the corridors, currencies, and volumes you need. We tailor onboarding to your institution instead of a one-size-fits-all setup.
Mutual due diligence, both ways: we verify your license and compliance program, and you verify ours, before a single transaction moves.
Send, receive, and hold multi-currency, multi-token, and stablecoin balances, and earn on the flow that moves through your corridor.
Go live through the Member Portal, a direct API, or a chat-based interface, whichever fits how your team already works. The snippet above is a live read straight from the ledger.
Request Sandbox docs →Three different ways institutions move money across borders today, each with a different answer to who's allowed in, who's liable for compliance, and who actually earns from the transaction.
Comparison criteria | UNYX Built for regulated institutions | Correspondent banking (SWIFT-messaged) | Closed-loop stablecoin systems |
|---|---|---|---|
Settlement model | Direct peer-to-peer settlement on a shared ledger, no intermediary chain | Payment routes through a chain of intermediary banks, each hop adds time and cost | Direct on-chain settlement, no intermediary chain |
Who can participate | Regulated, KYC/AML-verified financial institutions only | Only a few banks with a correspondent relationship | Anyone with a wallet, no licensing required |
Compliance & data security | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, every member verified once and recognized network-wide | Compliance is fragmented, each bank in the chain handles its own KYC independently | Typically pseudonymous, compliance is optional or absent by design |
Business model | Members earn from the corridors they open, settlement is a revenue line, not just a cost | Smaller banks pay fees upstream to correspondent banks; it's a cost line, not a revenue line | Speculative, no structural mechanism for institutional revenue share |